Programa Ejecutivo Avanzado · EMACBT
For CTOs and Chief AI Officers who have to decide on real deployments and answer for them before a Board: Cyber Behavior with stated validity, the obligations of the European AI Regulation, and behavioural metrics somebody can audit.
The pilot works, the supplier's demonstration works, and twelve months later real adoption shows up on no dashboard at all. Nobody measured conduct, they measured the system. Those are two different things, and only one of them answers to the Board.
Implementations steered by technical feasibility alone fail at adoption. What is missing is the scientific framework to integrate the system with the corporate behaviour that has to sustain it.
European regulation demands explainability, bias mitigation and a clear division of responsibility between whoever builds the system and whoever deploys it. Without a methodological framework, the legal and reputational exposure is yours.
95% accuracy, 200 ms latency, 99.9% availability. Then the CEO asks «by how much did our attrition fall?», and there is no clear answer.
The EMACBT Programa Ejecutivo Avanzado takes you from a competent technical lead to a scientific authority on what a system does and on what gets attributed to it, with:
The difference between a good CTO and a Scientist of Applied Intelligence NTMC is the ability to present scientific evidence where others present only informed opinion.
Build your professional authority step by step. Each level is individually certified.
Master the fundamentals. Apply validated instruments. Read a model's technical sheet without buying the narrative attached to it.
1–2 months
Lead deployments in mid-sized companies. Design human oversight so that it genuinely exists, and not only in the diagram.
4 months
Chief AI Officer. Complete systemic architecture and risk governance. Applied thesis, in person, in Madrid.
8 months
Recognised scientific authority. Eligible for Academy Associate. Lifetime access to the operational dataset.
18 months
Start at Foundation (€750), or go straight to the Programa Ejecutivo Avanzado? Let us talk.
18 months · 1,000 hours · 8 axes · 80 classes · hybrid modality
Next-token prediction · fine-tuning · retrieval augmentation · the judgement with which model capability is bought, or refused.
The digital trace as a sample with stated validity · what has genuinely been predicted · the legal limit of what a company may record.
Risk classification under the European AI Regulation · prohibited practices · bias measurement with a comparison group · division of responsibility.
The validity of the selection method as the first filter · what a model can and cannot sustain about a person · the VACE kept out of every cut-off decision.
Complacency · calibrated trust · joint performance · indicators that reveal whether human oversight exists or merely appears on paper.
The anatomy of deception · insider threat · indicators that change the outcome of a real incident, rather than clicks in a drill.
Building indices · social desirability in self-assessment · the conflict of interest of whoever diagnoses the problem and sells the cure.
A real AI implementation · a baseline taken before deployment · defence before a panel · manuscript for the SciTechBiz Review.
Deibson Silva
Neuropsychologist and Serial Tech Entrepreneur · Academic Director
Thirteen years developing the NTMC methodology from neuropsychological clinical practice toward rigorous corporate application. Founder of the SciTechBiz Institute, one institution with two offices: Madrid and London.
The combination matters for this programme in particular: a neuropsychologist who also builds and runs systems knows where what the model computes ends and where what we attribute to it begins. That is the line the Board will ask you to draw.
The difference between IT director and Chief AI Officer is not technical. It is methodological. The NTMC gave me the framework the Board needed to see.
My thesis on the European AI Regulation and Cyber Behavior was the case that opened doors at multinationals. The method changed everything.
Begin where it makes sense. Advance when you are ready. Each level is certified independently.
€750
+€2,490
+€1,750
Total €5,990
Let us discuss which level fits your professional moment · 25 min · no commitment.
The questions that repeat in every admission conversation. Direct answers.
That the model is almost never the problem. The first axis covers the technical workings because a common floor is needed, but the programme exists for the seven that follow: the digital trace as a sample with stated validity, human oversight measured rather than drawn, security treated as conduct. Those are exactly the questions a Board asks and a technical sheet does not answer.
No, and it does not compete with one. A vendor certification attests that you can operate their product. This programme gives you the judgement to decide whether that product should enter your organisation at all, with which controls and with which responsibility attached. The two usually sit well together.
With the same material you would use for any other decision: 1,000 structured hours across 18 months, an applied thesis on a real implementation with a baseline taken before deployment, and a method that states in writing what was measured and with which design. The full journey is €5,990, payable in up to 18 instalments.
No. The format is hybrid and built for executives in post: 18 months, 8 axes, 80 classes, with live sessions one evening a week and the in-person work concentrated in four intensives in Madrid, three days each, scheduled six months ahead.
Between 20 and 30 people per cohort, with at least three years in a leadership position: CTOs, CIOs, Chief AI Officers, heads of innovation and senior consultants with real responsibility over deployments in production. Admission always goes through a prior conversation.
That is the usual case: a real artificial intelligence implementation, with a refutable hypothesis and a baseline taken before deployment, defended before a panel. A manuscript for the SciTechBiz Review is derived from it.
Yes. Each level is certified independently and the amounts accumulate: €750 at Analyst, +€2,490 at Specialist, +€1,750 at the Advanced Scientific Programme, up to the €5,990 of the full journey.
A 1:1 conversation of 25 minutes, with no commitment and no sales pitch, to see whether the programme makes sense for your professional moment. If it does, the place is formalised for the January 2027 cohort.
The document with the 8 axes, the 80 classes, the cohort calendar and the investment structure. No automated newsletters: a personal reply.
A 1:1 conversation. No commitment. No sales pitch. Just clarity on whether the programme makes sense for your professional moment. And if you have a deployment about to go before a committee, we talk about that one.
No spam · no automated newsletters · a personal reply within 24 h.
An institutional title (título propio) of the SciTechBiz Institute, of 1,000 hours across 18 months. It does not declare credits or a level of the European qualifications framework.
