Programa Ejecutivo Avanzado · EMESGSL
For Chief Sustainability Officers who have to hold up a figure somebody is going to check, in front of an investor, an assurance provider or a supervisory authority. Human capital measured with a declared method and reported to CSRD, GRI and SASB.
Without anyone announcing it, the sustainability report has become the document with the heaviest legal consequences that your leadership signs. And it is still drafted with the same material it was drafted with when it carried none.
Your ESG report tells good stories about wellbeing and diversity. What it does not have is a methodological framework that holds those metrics up before an external audit that asks which indicator measures effort and which one measures result.
The European directive demands verifiable social information, with the ESRS standards behind it and an assurance scope almost nobody has read to the end. Traditional tools do not reach that far.
Impact funds compare companies against rigorous frameworks. With no defensible methodology you lose access to patient capital. Agency ratings, which diverge from one another, will not save you.
The EMESGSL Programa Ejecutivo Avanzado takes you from a sustainability lead with good judgement to a scientific authority on what your organisation measures and what it declares, with:
The difference between a good CSO and a Scientist of Human Sustainability NTMC is the ability to present scientific evidence where others present only informed opinion.
Build your professional authority step by step. Each level is individually certified.
Master the fundamentals. Apply validated instruments. Know which question each reporting framework answers.
1–2 months
Lead social measurement in mid-sized companies. Design indicators that tell effort from result.
4 months
Chief Sustainability Officer. Complete architecture of materiality and assurance. Applied thesis, in person, in Madrid.
8 months
Recognised scientific authority. Eligible for Academy Associate. Lifetime access to the operational dataset.
18 months
Start at Foundation (€750), or go straight to the Programa Ejecutivo Avanzado? Let us talk.
18 months · 1,000 hours · 8 axes · 80 classes · hybrid modality
GRI · SASB · TCFD · CSRD and its ESRS standards · ISSB · what an ESG rating actually contains and which question each framework answers.
Who counts as workforce · effort indicators against result indicators · what happened once publishing the pay gap became compulsory.
What governance ratings predict · who controls the Board agenda · what a soft target costs · the whistleblowing channel and who receives it.
The emissions inventory laid open · why a purchased credit is not an avoided emission · where Scope 3 comes from and with what uncertainty.
What would have happened without the intervention · the chain from output to impact · monetisation with stated assumptions · the independence of whoever evaluates.
Which claim can be disproved · which commitment binds someone by name · which decision changes once the budget enters the conversation.
Materiality analysis done properly · the scope of limited assurance · justifying an omission · what reaches the market when the analyst reads an extract.
ESG strategy with verifiable measurement · primary outcome and limitations declared before the result is known · defence before a panel · manuscript for the SciTechBiz Review.
Deibson Silva
Neuropsychologist and Serial Tech Entrepreneur · Academic Director
Thirteen years developing the NTMC methodology from neuropsychological clinical practice toward rigorous corporate application. Founder of the SciTechBiz Institute, one institution with two offices: Madrid and London.
The softest letter in the acronym is the one that gives this programme its name, and it is also the one that has least allowed itself to be measured. Thirteen years measuring human conduct inside organisations is what makes it possible to demand of the «S» what is already demanded of the «E»: a declared method, a declared margin, and somebody who answers for the figure.
My thesis was «Methodology for Pillar S Verification Under CSRD». Three months later the CEO promoted me and tripled my mandate.
I used to sell «ESG consulting». Now I am the scientific authority companies need to cite in their reports. That changed everything.
Begin where it makes sense. Advance when you are ready. Each level is certified independently.
€750
+€2,490
+€1,750
Total €5,990
Let us discuss which level fits your professional moment · 25 min · no commitment.
The questions that repeat in every admission conversation. Direct answers.
Yes, and from the angle that decides things: the perimeter, which has been rewritten twice; the real scope of a limited assurance engagement; and what obliges you to justify an omission. The programme does not teach you to fill in the standard. It teaches you to hold up every figure that goes inside it when somebody asks where it came from.
An agency score does not measure sustainability. It measures what that agency decided to score, and the ratings different agencies give the same company diverge in documented ways. The first axis starts precisely there, because a compliant report and a company that is improving are two things that need not coincide.
With the same material you would use for any other decision: 1,000 structured hours across 18 months, an applied thesis on an ESG strategy with verifiable measurement, and a method that states in writing what was measured, with what margin and with what limitations. The full journey is €5,990, payable in up to 18 instalments.
No. The format is hybrid and built for executives in post: 18 months, 8 axes, 80 classes, with live sessions one evening a week and the in-person work concentrated in four intensives in Madrid, three days each, scheduled six months ahead.
Between 20 and 30 people per cohort, with at least three years in a leadership position: Chief Sustainability Officers, board secretaries, heads of risk and compliance, and executives with real responsibility over what the organisation declares. Admission always goes through a prior conversation.
That is the usual case: an ESG strategy with verifiable measurement, with the provenance of every data point, the primary outcome and the limitations set down in writing before the result is known, and defended before a panel. A manuscript for the SciTechBiz Review is derived from it.
Yes. Each level is certified independently and the amounts accumulate: €750 at Analyst, +€2,490 at Specialist, +€1,750 at the Advanced Scientific Programme, up to the €5,990 of the full journey.
A 1:1 conversation of 25 minutes, with no commitment and no sales pitch, to see whether the programme makes sense for your professional moment. If it does, the place is formalised for the January 2027 cohort.
The document with the 8 axes, the 80 classes, the cohort calendar and the investment structure. No automated newsletters: a personal reply.
A 1:1 conversation. No commitment. No sales pitch. Just clarity on whether the programme makes sense for your professional moment. And if your next report is already being drafted, about which figure in it worries you most.
No spam · no automated newsletters · a personal reply within 24 h.
An institutional title (título propio) of the SciTechBiz Institute, of 1,000 hours across 18 months. It does not declare credits or a level of the European qualifications framework.
